Sustainable lifestyles: What is your carbon footprint?

Your carbon footprint is a measurement of the impact you have in terms of greenhouse gas emissions your life is producing.

Many of the things you do daily are sending greenhouses gases into the atmosphere and increasing the environmental burden the earth is carrying. Whenever you drive your car or motorbike, travel in an aeroplane or turn on the gas hob or barbecue you are sending CO2 into the air. If you heat your house by gas, or your electricity is generated by burning natural gas or other fossil fuels the outcome is the same.
Per capita figures for carbon emissions show that whilst an American sends a yearly total of some 20 tons of carbon dioxide into the air whilst someone in the UK is responsible for around 10 tons. It may be obvious to use that folks in the USA have a potential to cut greenhouse gases at a far higher rate than in the UK, but that is no excuse not to minimise our individual carbon footprint. This is not particularly difficult.

Here are some effective ways:

Cut down on your petrol/diesel usage. Drive a more economical car or share your drive to work (this can save a great deal) bicycle to work or even walk or take the bus.

Generate your own electricity and reduce waste by adding solar panels for your home, installing a wind turbine or a ground source heat pump, collecting rainwater for reuse and recycling household waste.

Reduce your energy usage in the home. There are simple ways. Don’t use your oven for only one item. Bung in an extra pie or casserole and freeze for later (use an energy efficient chest freezer)

You can find out your carbon footprint by using the calculator on the WWF website. Try it. You may really want to change afterwards!

Get rid of carbon dioxide in the ocean?

Most countries have agreed to set a target to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions. One idea being investigated by scientists is reduce carbon dioxide by a process called carbon sequestration into the oceans. One idea is to try to increase the usual levels of uptake of carbon dioxide by microscopic and unicellular plants collectively called phytoplankton. This would involve, so one theory goes, of seeding the world’s ocean’s with iron (a food for the plankton) which would hopefully increase the productivity of these plants and enable those tiny plant organisms at or near the sea surface to absorb more carbon dioxide so taking it from the atmosphere and storing it in the ocean. There are many doubts about what impact this would have on the marine life and ecosystems and whether it will actually do what the theory predicts.

A second idea of using the oceans for sequestration of carbon dioxide is to inject liquid carbon dioxide into the pecan deeps at 1500m and store it there for several hundred years or for longer periods if put at depths of 300m or more where the density of the liquid carbon dioxide is greater than that of water. This would create a submarine lake in a trench on the seabed, so scientists postulate. There is also the prediction that solid carbon dioxide blocks should be able to be produced which would therefore sink to the bottom of the ocean. There is much concern over the impact of such actions.

The sun’s variation and global warming

The role of the changes in the sun’s output in overall global climate change has not been particularly well understood. There is an 11 year solar cycle when the activity of the sun goes up and down, and scientists have been investigating what kind of influence these changes have on the Earth’s climate relative to the relative concentration of greenhouse gases. One of the most enduring climate change myths is that it is the sun that is causing global warming/. The argument is only sustained by being selective with the data chosen highlighting periods when the sun and climate changes are in some synchrony and ignoring recent data where they diverge. 

The changes in solar irradiance have only been measured with some accuracy by satellites for around 30 years, this very precise data show changes only of a few tenths of a percent depending on the level of solar activity over the 11 year cycle. Changes over longer periods have to be estimated from other sources which are important for building climate models. It is known that one component of recent global climate change was contributed by the increased solar activity of the last solar cycle; this was only a small part when compared with the impact of the additional greenhouse gases over the last period. In fact, over the last 39 years of overall global rise in temperature, the sun has shown a cooling trend and thus the sun’s activity and global warming are going in entirely opposite directions. Groups of scientists have independently concluded that the sun therefore cannot be the cause of recent global warming as the effects of global climate change are apparent regardless of the data showing that the sun is again less bright during a period of minimum solar activity.